1984 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 2013 Cadillac XTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac XTS is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac XTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac XTS weights approximately 1252 kg more than 1984 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 2013 Cadillac XTS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Autobianchi A 112. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Cadillac XTS has automatic transmission and 1984 Autobianchi A 112 has manual transmission. 1984 Autobianchi A 112 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac XTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Autobianchi A 112 | 2013 Cadillac XTS | |
Make | Autobianchi | Cadillac |
Model | A 112 | XTS |
Year Released | 1984 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 963 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 314 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1912 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 5131 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1852 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2837 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 76 L |