1984 Bitter SC vs. 2000 Ford Equator
To start off, 2000 Ford Equator is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Bitter SC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Bitter SC would be higher. At 2,968 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Bitter SC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Bitter SC (177 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2000 Ford Equator. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Bitter SC should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Bitter SC weights approximately 392 kg more than 2000 Ford Equator. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1984 Bitter SC (248 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 1984 Bitter SC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Bitter SC | 2000 Ford Equator | |
| Make | Bitter | Ford |
| Model | SC | Equator |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2968 cc | 1787 cc |
| Horse Power | 177 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 248 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1208 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3260 mm |
