1984 Bitter SC vs. 2000 Toyota Solara
To start off, 2000 Toyota Solara is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Bitter SC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Bitter SC would be higher. At 2,999 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Solara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Solara (187 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1984 Bitter SC. (177 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Solara should accelerate faster than 1984 Bitter SC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Solara weights approximately 10 kg more than 1984 Bitter SC. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1984 Bitter SC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Bitter SC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Solara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Solara (283 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Bitter SC. (248 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Solara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Bitter SC.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Bitter SC | 2000 Toyota Solara | |
Make | Bitter | Toyota |
Model | SC | Solara |
Year Released | 1984 | 2000 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2968 cc | 2999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 177 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 248 Nm | 283 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 95.1 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 69.8 mm | 83.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2610 mm |