1984 Bitter SC vs. 2009 Ford E-350
To start off, 2009 Ford E-350 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Bitter SC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Bitter SC would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1984 Bitter SC. (207 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1984 Bitter SC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Bitter SC weights approximately 634 kg more than 2009 Ford E-350.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford E-350 (475 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Bitter SC. (312 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2009 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Bitter SC.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Bitter SC | 2009 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Bitter | Ford |
Model | SC | E-350 |
Year Released | 1984 | 2009 |
Body Type | Convertible | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3849 cc | 5408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 207 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 475 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 15 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 2140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3510 mm |