1984 Bitter SC vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Bitter SC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Bitter SC would be higher. At 3,849 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Bitter SC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (268 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1984 Bitter SC. (207 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1984 Bitter SC.
Because 1984 Bitter SC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Bitter SC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Bitter SC (312 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda CX-9. (269 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1984 Bitter SC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda CX-9.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Bitter SC | 2009 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Bitter | Mazda |
Model | SC | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1984 | 2009 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3849 cc | 3727 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 207 HP | 268 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 269 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2340 mm |