1984 Bitter SC vs. 2012 Chevrolet Orlando
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Orlando is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Bitter SC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Bitter SC would be higher. At 2,968 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Bitter SC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Bitter SC (177 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Orlando. (174 HP @ 6700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Bitter SC should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Orlando.
Because 2012 Chevrolet Orlando is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Bitter SC. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Orlando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Bitter SC (248 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Orlando. (232 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 1984 Bitter SC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Orlando.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Bitter SC | 2012 Chevrolet Orlando | |
Make | Bitter | Chevrolet |
Model | SC | Orlando |
Year Released | 1984 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2968 cc | 2384 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 177 HP | 174 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6700 RPM |
Torque | 248 Nm | 232 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4652 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1836 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1633 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2760 mm |