1984 BMW 725 vs. 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv
To start off, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 BMW 725. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 BMW 725 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv (276 HP @ 9000 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1984 BMW 725. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv should accelerate faster than 1984 BMW 725.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 BMW 725 (215 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv. (214 Nm @ 8000 RPM). This means 1984 BMW 725 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 BMW 725 | 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv | |
| Make | BMW | Mazda |
| Model | 725 | RX-Evolv |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2495 cc | 2616 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 276 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 9000 RPM |
| Torque | 215 Nm | 214 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 8000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1360 mm |
