1984 BMW M6 vs. 2009 Cadillac XLR

To start off, 2009 Cadillac XLR is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 BMW M6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 BMW M6 would be higher. At 4,369 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac XLR (444 HP) has 158 more horse power than 1984 BMW M6. (286 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1984 BMW M6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 215 kg more than 1984 BMW M6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac XLR (561 Nm) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 BMW M6. (334 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 BMW M6. 2009 Cadillac XLR has automatic transmission and 1984 BMW M6 has manual transmission. 1984 BMW M6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac XLR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: