1984 BMW M6 vs. 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR
To start off, 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 BMW M6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 BMW M6 would be higher. At 4,719 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR (1,064 HP) has 778 more horse power than 1984 BMW M6. (286 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR should accelerate faster than 1984 BMW M6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 BMW M6 weights approximately 226 kg more than 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR (1,060 Nm) has 726 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 BMW M6. (334 Nm). This means 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 BMW M6.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 BMW M6 | 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR | |
| Make | BMW | Koenigsegg |
| Model | M6 | CCXR |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3453 cc | 4719 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 286 HP | 1064 HP |
| Torque | 334 Nm | 1060 Nm |
| Top Speed | 254 km/hour | 400 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1506 kg | 1280 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2660 mm |
