1984 Bristol Beaufighter vs. 1982 Chrysler E
To start off, 1984 Bristol Beaufighter is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Bristol Beaufighter is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Bristol Beaufighter weights approximately 505 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E.
Because 1984 Bristol Beaufighter is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Bristol Beaufighter. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Bristol Beaufighter | 1982 Chrysler E | |
Make | Bristol | Chrysler |
Model | Beaufighter | E |
Year Released | 1984 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 2213 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 141 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2630 mm |