1984 Bristol Beaufighter vs. 1996 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1996 Ford Ranger is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Bristol Beaufighter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Bristol Beaufighter would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Bristol Beaufighter is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Bristol Beaufighter weights approximately 355 kg more than 1996 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Bristol Beaufighter | 1996 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Bristol | Ford |
Model | Beaufighter | Ranger |
Year Released | 1984 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 2507 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1395 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2840 mm |