1984 Bristol Beaufighter vs. 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Bristol Beaufighter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Bristol Beaufighter would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Bristol Beaufighter is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Bristol Beaufighter weights approximately 346 kg more than 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1984 Bristol Beaufighter is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Bristol Beaufighter. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Bristol Beaufighter | 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Bristol | Oldsmobile |
Model | Beaufighter | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1984 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 3135 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 150 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1404 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2720 mm |