1984 Bristol Beaufighter vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Bristol Beaufighter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Bristol Beaufighter would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Bristol Beaufighter is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Bristol Beaufighter weights approximately 940 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3.
Because 1984 Bristol Beaufighter is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Bristol Beaufighter. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1984 Bristol Beaufighter has automatic transmission and 2006 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2006 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1984 Bristol Beaufighter will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Bristol Beaufighter | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Bristol | Mazda |
| Model | Beaufighter | 3 |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5898 cc | 1998 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 139 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 810 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2650 mm |
