1984 Bristol Beaufighter vs. 2010 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2010 Suzuki Equator is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Bristol Beaufighter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Bristol Beaufighter would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Bristol Beaufighter is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Bristol Beaufighter weights approximately 455 kg more than 2010 Suzuki Equator.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Bristol Beaufighter | 2010 Suzuki Equator | |
| Make | Bristol | Suzuki |
| Model | Beaufighter | Equator |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5898 cc | 3954 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 261 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1295 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 5250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3200 mm |
