1984 Buick Skyhawk vs. 1962 Humber Hawk
To start off, 1984 Buick Skyhawk is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Humber Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Humber Hawk would be higher. At 2,265 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Humber Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Buick Skyhawk (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1962 Humber Hawk. (73 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Buick Skyhawk should accelerate faster than 1962 Humber Hawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Humber Hawk weights approximately 355 kg more than 1984 Buick Skyhawk.
Because 1962 Humber Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Humber Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Buick Skyhawk | 1962 Humber Hawk | |
| Make | Buick | Humber |
| Model | Skyhawk | Hawk |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2265 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 73 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1435 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2800 mm |
