1984 Buick Skyhawk vs. 1963 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 1984 Buick Skyhawk is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Buick Skyhawk (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1963 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Buick Skyhawk should accelerate faster than 1963 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Buick Skyhawk weights approximately 48 kg more than 1963 Jeep CJ5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Buick Skyhawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Buick Skyhawk | 1963 Jeep CJ5 | |
| Make | Buick | Jeep |
| Model | Skyhawk | CJ5 |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1032 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 3520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2060 mm |
