1984 Buick Skyhawk vs. 1982 Cadillac Eldorado
To start off, 1984 Buick Skyhawk is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 4,080 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Cadillac Eldorado (123 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1984 Buick Skyhawk. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1984 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 560 kg more than 1984 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Buick Skyhawk | 1982 Cadillac Eldorado | |
| Make | Buick | Cadillac |
| Model | Skyhawk | Eldorado |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 4080 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1640 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 5190 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2900 mm |
