1984 Buick Skyhawk vs. 1982 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1984 Buick Skyhawk is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 4,186 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Ford Thunderbird (111 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1984 Buick Skyhawk. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1984 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 497 kg more than 1984 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Buick Skyhawk | 1982 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | Skyhawk | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 1984 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 4186 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1577 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2760 mm |