1984 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2000 Caterham 21
To start off, 2000 Caterham 21 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Caterham 21 (230 HP @ 8600 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1984 Buick Skyhawk. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Caterham 21 should accelerate faster than 1984 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Buick Skyhawk weights approximately 540 kg more than 2000 Caterham 21.
Because 2000 Caterham 21 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Caterham 21. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Buick Skyhawk | 2000 Caterham 21 | |
| Make | Buick | Caterham |
| Model | Skyhawk | 21 |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1794 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 230 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 8600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2230 mm |
