1984 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK
To start off, 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK (301 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 1984 Buick Skyhawk. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1984 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 580 kg more than 1984 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Buick Skyhawk | 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
Make | Buick | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Skyhawk | CLK |
Year Released | 1984 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 4966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 301 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2860 mm |