1984 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2005 SsangYong Rexton
To start off, 2005 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 2,873 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 SsangYong Rexton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 SsangYong Rexton (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1984 Buick Skyhawk. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Rexton should accelerate faster than 1984 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 771 kg more than 1984 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 SsangYong Rexton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Buick Skyhawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Rexton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Buick Skyhawk | 2005 SsangYong Rexton | |
Make | Buick | SsangYong |
Model | Skyhawk | Rexton |
Year Released | 1984 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2873 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1851 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2830 mm |