1984 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (108 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1984 Buick Skyhawk. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1984 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 398 kg more than 1984 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Buick Skyhawk | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | Skyhawk | Ranger |
Year Released | 1984 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1478 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3010 mm |