1984 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2008 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2008 Cadillac CTS is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac CTS (210 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1984 Buick Skyhawk. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1984 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 480 kg more than 1984 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Cadillac CTS is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Buick Skyhawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Buick Skyhawk | 2008 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Buick | Cadillac |
| Model | Skyhawk | CTS |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2792 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1560 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2890 mm |
