1984 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2010 Mercedes-Benz CL
To start off, 2010 Mercedes-Benz CL is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Mercedes-Benz CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mercedes-Benz CL (518 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 429 more horse power than 1984 Buick Skyhawk. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mercedes-Benz CL should accelerate faster than 1984 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mercedes-Benz CL weights approximately 1006 kg more than 1984 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Mercedes-Benz CL is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Mercedes-Benz CL. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Buick Skyhawk | 2010 Mercedes-Benz CL | |
Make | Buick | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Skyhawk | CL |
Year Released | 1984 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 518 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 2086 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 5065 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1872 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2954 mm |