1984 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2013 Mazda CX-09
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-09 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Mazda CX-09 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda CX-09 (269 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 180 more horse power than 1984 Buick Skyhawk. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-09 should accelerate faster than 1984 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda CX-09 weights approximately 982 kg more than 1984 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Mazda CX-09 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Buick Skyhawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-09 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Buick Skyhawk | 2013 Mazda CX-09 | |
| Make | Buick | Mazda |
| Model | Skyhawk | CX-09 |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3726 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 269 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 2062 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 5108 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1936 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2875 mm |
