1984 Buick Skylark vs. 2004 Ford E-350
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Buick Skylark. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Buick Skylark would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1984 Buick Skylark. (123 HP @ 4900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1984 Buick Skylark. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1238 kg more than 1984 Buick Skylark. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 272 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Buick Skylark. (203 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Buick Skylark.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Buick Skylark | 2004 Ford E-350 | |
| Make | Buick | Ford |
| Model | Skylark | E-350 |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2966 cc | 5408 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 255 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 475 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 2488 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 2140 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3510 mm |
