1984 Buick Skylark vs. 2005 Mazda 6
To start off, 2005 Mazda 6 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Buick Skylark. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Buick Skylark would be higher. Both 1984 Buick Skylark and 2005 Mazda 6 are equipped with a 2,966 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda 6 (220 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1984 Buick Skylark. (123 HP @ 4900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1984 Buick Skylark. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda 6 weights approximately 290 kg more than 1984 Buick Skylark. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda 6 (260 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Buick Skylark. (203 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Buick Skylark.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Buick Skylark | 2005 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Buick | Mazda |
Model | Skylark | 6 |
Year Released | 1984 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 260 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2630 mm |