1984 Buick Skylark vs. 2008 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2008 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Buick Skylark. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Buick Skylark would be higher. At 3,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (172 HP) has 49 more horse power than 1984 Buick Skylark. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1984 Buick Skylark.
Because 2008 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Buick Skylark. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Buick Skylark. (203 Nm). This means 2008 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Buick Skylark.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Buick Skylark | 2008 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Buick | Jeep |
Model | Skylark | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1984 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 3979 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 172 HP |
Torque | 203 Nm | 319 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1820 mm |