1984 Buick Skylark vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Buick Skylark. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Buick Skylark would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Buick Skylark is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Buick Skylark (123 HP) has 19 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (104 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Buick Skylark should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Buick Skylark weights approximately 295 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Buick Skylark (203 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (145 Nm). This means 1984 Buick Skylark will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Buick Skylark | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Buick | Mazda |
Model | Skylark | 6 |
Year Released | 1984 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 104 HP |
Torque | 203 Nm | 145 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 955 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2610 mm |