1984 Buick Skylark vs. 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Buick Skylark. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Buick Skylark would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML (240 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1984 Buick Skylark. (123 HP @ 4900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1984 Buick Skylark.
Because 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Buick Skylark. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML (616 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 413 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Buick Skylark. (203 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Buick Skylark.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Buick Skylark | 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
Make | Buick | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Skylark | ML |
Year Released | 1984 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 616 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 7-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4803 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2141 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1796 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2916 mm |