1984 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1984 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1200 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102.
Because 1984 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 102, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Cadillac Brougham | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Cadillac | Zastava |
Model | Brougham | 102 |
Year Released | 1984 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 5032 cc | 1115 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2160 mm |