1984 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2000 Ford Escape
To start off, 2000 Ford Escape is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 378 kg more than 2000 Ford Escape.
Because 2000 Ford Escape is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Cadillac Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Escape will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Cadillac Brougham | 2000 Ford Escape | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | Brougham | Escape |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5032 cc | 2967 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 200 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 1572 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2630 mm |
