1984 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2009 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2009 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 360 kg more than 1984 Cadillac Brougham.
Because 1984 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Cadillac Brougham | 2009 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Cadillac | Volkswagen |
Model | Brougham | Polo |
Year Released | 1984 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5032 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 2310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2470 mm |