1984 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1949 Holden FX
To start off, 1984 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Cadillac Cimarron (124 HP) has 73 more horse power than 1949 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1949 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 178 kg more than 1949 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1949 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Cadillac Cimarron | 1949 Holden FX | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | Cimarron | FX |
Year Released | 1984 | 1949 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 2166 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 51 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 972 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2620 mm |