1984 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1965 Holden FB Special
To start off, 1984 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Holden FB Special. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Holden FB Special would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Cadillac Cimarron (124 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1965 Holden FB Special. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1965 Holden FB Special. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 50 kg more than 1965 Holden FB Special. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Holden FB Special is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Holden FB Special. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Cadillac Cimarron | 1965 Holden FB Special | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | Cimarron | FB Special |
Year Released | 1984 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2670 mm |