1984 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1974 Skoda 110 L
To start off, 1984 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Skoda 110 L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Skoda 110 L would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Cadillac Cimarron (124 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1974 Skoda 110 L. (43 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1974 Skoda 110 L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 345 kg more than 1974 Skoda 110 L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1974 Skoda 110 L is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Skoda 110 L. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Cadillac Cimarron | 1974 Skoda 110 L | |
| Make | Cadillac | Skoda |
| Model | Cimarron | 110 L |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2844 cc | 995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 805 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2410 mm |
