1984 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1986 Caterham 1700
To start off, 1986 Caterham 1700 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1984 Cadillac Cimarron. (124 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 1984 Cadillac Cimarron.
Because 1986 Caterham 1700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Caterham 1700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Cadillac Cimarron | 1986 Caterham 1700 | |
Make | Cadillac | Caterham |
Model | Cimarron | 1700 |
Year Released | 1984 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 1692 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2260 mm |