1984 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1998 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 1998 Mazda RX-7 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mazda RX-7 (280 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 1984 Cadillac Cimarron. (124 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 1984 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mazda RX-7 weights approximately 120 kg more than 1984 Cadillac Cimarron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1998 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Cadillac Cimarron | 1998 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | Cimarron | RX-7 |
Year Released | 1984 | 1998 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 280 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1270 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2430 mm |