1984 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1999 MCC Smart
To start off, 1999 MCC Smart is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Cadillac Cimarron (124 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1999 MCC Smart. (53 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1999 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 450 kg more than 1999 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Cadillac Cimarron | 1999 MCC Smart | |
Make | Cadillac | MCC |
Model | Cimarron | Smart |
Year Released | 1984 | 1999 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2280 mm |