1984 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2000 Nissan Terrano II
To start off, 2000 Nissan Terrano II is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Cadillac Cimarron (124 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2000 Nissan Terrano II. (116 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 2000 Nissan Terrano II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Nissan Terrano II weights approximately 475 kg more than 1984 Cadillac Cimarron.
Because 2000 Nissan Terrano II is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Cadillac Cimarron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Nissan Terrano II will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Cadillac Cimarron | 2000 Nissan Terrano II | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | Cimarron | Terrano II |
Year Released | 1984 | 2000 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 2388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 116 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1625 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2660 mm |