1984 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2000 Smart ForTwo

To start off, 2000 Smart ForTwo is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Cadillac Cimarron (124 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2000 Smart ForTwo. (74 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 2000 Smart ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 330 kg more than 2000 Smart ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2000 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1984 Cadillac Cimarron 2000 Smart ForTwo
Make Cadillac Smart
Model Cimarron ForTwo
Year Released 1984 2000
Body Type Sedan Convertible
Engine Position Front Rear
Engine Size 2844 cc 698 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 124 HP 74 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 5250 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1150 kg 820 kg
Vehicle Length 4530 mm 2510 mm
Vehicle Width 1660 mm 1540 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 1820 mm