1984 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 6 (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1984 Cadillac Cimarron. (124 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1984 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 455 kg more than 1984 Cadillac Cimarron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Mazda 6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Cadillac Cimarron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Cadillac Cimarron | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | Cimarron | 6 |
Year Released | 1984 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1605 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2680 mm |