1984 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2006 BMW 630
To start off, 2006 BMW 630 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 BMW 630 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 630 (254 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1984 Cadillac Cimarron. (124 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 630 should accelerate faster than 1984 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 BMW 630 weights approximately 416 kg more than 1984 Cadillac Cimarron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 BMW 630 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 BMW 630. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Cadillac Cimarron | 2006 BMW 630 | |
Make | Cadillac | BMW |
Model | Cimarron | 630 |
Year Released | 1984 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 2996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 254 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1566 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2790 mm |