1984 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2009 Nissan Murano
To start off, 2009 Nissan Murano is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Murano is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Murano (265 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1984 Cadillac Cimarron. (124 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Murano should accelerate faster than 1984 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Nissan Murano weights approximately 292 kg more than 1984 Cadillac Cimarron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Cadillac Cimarron | 2009 Nissan Murano | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | Cimarron | Murano |
Year Released | 1984 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 3498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1442 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2830 mm |