1984 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2010 Ford Ranger

To start off, 2010 Ford Ranger is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1984 Cadillac Cimarron. (124 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1984 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Ranger weights approximately 297 kg more than 1984 Cadillac Cimarron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2010 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications: