1984 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2011 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2011 Lotus Evora is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Lotus Evora is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Lotus Evora (276 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1984 Cadillac Cimarron. (124 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 1984 Cadillac Cimarron.
Because 2011 Lotus Evora is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Lotus Evora. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Cadillac Cimarron | 2011 Lotus Evora | |
| Make | Cadillac | Lotus |
| Model | Cimarron | Evora |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2844 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 276 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4341 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1849 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2576 mm |
