1984 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1964 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1984 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 4,085 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Cadillac DeVille (129 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1964 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1964 Lotus Elan.
Because 1964 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1984 Cadillac DeVille has automatic transmission and 1964 Lotus Elan has manual transmission. 1964 Lotus Elan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1984 Cadillac DeVille will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Cadillac DeVille | 1964 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Cadillac | Lotus |
Model | DeVille | Elan |
Year Released | 1984 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4085 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2820 mm | 2140 mm |