1984 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1996 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 1996 Mazda RX-01 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 4,499 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 450 kg more than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Because 1984 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-01, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Cadillac DeVille | 1996 Mazda RX-01 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | DeVille | RX-01 |
Year Released | 1984 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4499 cc | 2615 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 217 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2820 mm | 2350 mm |