1984 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 4,085 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Cadillac DeVille (129 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 195 kg more than 2003 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Cadillac DeVille (271 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 6. (240 Nm). This means 1984 Cadillac DeVille will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Cadillac DeVille | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | DeVille | 6 |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4085 cc | 1594 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 271 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1345 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2820 mm | 2610 mm |
