1984 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover

To start off, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 4,499 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 960 kg more than 1984 Cadillac DeVille.

Because 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1984 Cadillac DeVille 2005 Land Rover Range Rover
Make Cadillac Land Rover
Model DeVille Range Rover
Year Released 1984 2005
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4499 cc 4398 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 0 HP 282 HP
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1550 kg 2510 kg
Vehicle Length 4960 mm 4960 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1960 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1870 mm
Wheelbase Size 2820 mm 2890 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]